# Difference between revisions of "Correlation of reconstructed lensing template to ideal"

m |
|||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | February 1 | + | February 1 2019, Clem Pryke |

In [[Sim map sets to demonstrate "real delensing" (02.00 and 02.09)]] I introduced some high res sims to run lensing reconstruction on. | In [[Sim map sets to demonstrate "real delensing" (02.00 and 02.09)]] I introduced some high res sims to run lensing reconstruction on. |

## Revision as of 11:10, 4 February 2019

February 1 2019, Clem Pryke

In Sim map sets to demonstrate "real delensing" (02.00 and 02.09) I introduced some high res sims to run lensing reconstruction on. In Ready for delensing use lensing maps 02.00 Julien Carron provided reconstructed Q/U lensing templates from these. In [1] I took these through to power spectra. Finally in [2] Caterina showed that these templates deliver effective A_L around 0.5 In the last posting it is also shown with that a perfect lensing template delivers A_L close to zero. (Where by a perfect template I mean the difference of the lensed and unlensed sims.)

I think Julienne ran his reconstruction on the 145GHz high res maps from 02.00 - it says so in Lensing reconstructions 02.00. The high res sims for 02 where made for 85/145/220 Ghz bands just copying the uK-arcmin levels from the corresponding low res bands of the 02 set. These appear to be 1.72/4.89/12.54 uK-arcmin. So 145GHz may not have been the best choice - 95GHz would be better.

To gauge the fidelity of lensing templates it presumably isn't necessary to go all the way through to sigma(r). Instead we can just take the B-mode cross correlation between the reconstructed and perfect templates. The plot below shows this for the first realization. We get about 0.7 correlation at ell 30 to 150 - so if it goes as the square that matches the A_L=0.5 equivalent. Julien also provided templates reconstructed from the signal only maps, but I think he then used the same noise based filtering that was applied when reconstructing from the signal+noise maps - so that may be why the correlation is only a little higher.

Next steps include asking Julien to provide templates from the 95GHz signal+noise maps and probably also from the signal only maps using all modes so that we can probe the algorithmic limitations coming from non-iterative reconstruction and flat sky approximation.