Difference between revisions of "UCSD-2019: Cross-Cut: Sidelobes & Shielding including Simulation"

From CMB-S4 wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
#* Sara M. Simon : Scan Synchronous Signal [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10_ZPM1xvI3XoLM81-nntdGzf_xicV6y1-UJ-dfnidF0/edit#slide=id.p1 slides]
 
#* Sara M. Simon : Scan Synchronous Signal [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10_ZPM1xvI3XoLM81-nntdGzf_xicV6y1-UJ-dfnidF0/edit#slide=id.p1 slides]
 
#* Clem Pryke : Connecting raw detector sensitivity and optimized scanning strategies with final map depth [http://bicep.rc.fas.harvard.edu/CMB-S4/analysis_logbook/20190509_b3_obseff wiki post]
 
#* Clem Pryke : Connecting raw detector sensitivity and optimized scanning strategies with final map depth [http://bicep.rc.fas.harvard.edu/CMB-S4/analysis_logbook/20190509_b3_obseff wiki post]
#* Reijo Keskitalo : Atmospheric signal
+
#* Reijo Keskitalo : Atmospheric signal [https://crd.lbl.gov/assets/Uploads/atm-10-30-10v1.gif animation]
 
#* All : discussion on the ground and atmosphere simulation plan
 
#* All : discussion on the ground and atmosphere simulation plan
 
#** Define "timestream performance requirements".  How do they map onto pixel and multipole noise requirements?
 
#** Define "timestream performance requirements".  How do they map onto pixel and multipole noise requirements?

Revision as of 09:58, 18 October 2019

Link back to agenda

Charge

This session combines two originally proposed sessions:

  1. Shielding / sidelobes / optical performance
    • Synthesize thinking on optical simulations and sidelobes from ST and LT and ensure all issues are covered, and that people are communicating appropriately.
    • Connect the sidelobe performance requirements (from measurements and observing simulations) to instrument requirements on shielding and cryogenic absorbers
    • Evaluate performance of existing shielding plans in both ST and LT
    • Evaluate groundshield requirements separately for south pole (flat) and Chile (~15 degree mountains nearby)
  2. Atmosphere & Ground-Pickup modeling for simulations
    • Define the simulation plan for connecting timestream performance requirements like low-frequency performance and modulator speed to map-space and ell-space noise requirements
    • Define a simulation plan for connecting ground temperature variation and ground shielding plan to map-space and ell-space noise requirements


Agenda

  1. Shielding / sidelobes / optical performance
    • Patricio Gallardo pdf and Johanna Nagy File:CWRU ground pickup.pdf: LAT Sidelobe calculations and addressing whether a LAT ground screen is needed
    • Kirit Karkare : Science forecasts including LAT/SAT sidelobes and non-ideal instrument performance slides
    • Tyler St. Germaine: SAT sidelobes slides
    • Discussion of next steps for sidelobe and optical performance modeling and integration into simulations
  2. Atmosphere & Ground-Pickup modeling for simulations
    • Sara M. Simon : Scan Synchronous Signal slides
    • Clem Pryke : Connecting raw detector sensitivity and optimized scanning strategies with final map depth wiki post
    • Reijo Keskitalo : Atmospheric signal animation
    • All : discussion on the ground and atmosphere simulation plan
      • Define "timestream performance requirements". How do they map onto pixel and multipole noise requirements?
      • How does one go from ground temperature variation and ground shielding plan to pixel and multipole noise requirements?

Remote attendance

Zoom link


Notes